<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for So little time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>If I had more time, this could be a cool blog site...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on C++ Abstract Classes + Serialization by Jack Altiere &#187; Using the Factory Pattern</title>
		<link>http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/?p=14#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Altiere &#187; Using the Factory Pattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/?p=14#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] was using C++ and he eventually came up with a good solution to the problem, but it got me wondering how I would handle the same requirements using C#.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was using C++ and he eventually came up with a good solution to the problem, but it got me wondering how I would handle the same requirements using C#.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C++ Abstract Classes + Serialization by Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/?p=14#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/?p=14#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I'm glad to see you found a solution for this, this looks like a good way to do it.  After looking at it though, I will have to admit I'm spoiled writing managed code all the time. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see you found a solution for this, this looks like a good way to do it.  After looking at it though, I will have to admit I&#8217;m spoiled writing managed code all the time. <img src='http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PHP/GTK by bmr</title>
		<link>http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/?p=4#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>bmr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/?p=4#comment-3</guid>
		<description>It is the most useful comment on my blog so far.  I guess I was thinking that if I use Java, then I would not use GTK.  C++/gtkmm is probably the safest bet since it can definitely provide everything I need and, as you said in some other post, it is easier to find resources to work on C++ rather than some halfway commented pet project like PHP-GTK.  Although I still think PHP-GTK could be cool.

Probably the right thing to do is to generate a little more formal specification for what we are trying to do and then discuss it more.  I can't seem to settle on a technology for this, so that is not a good thing.  However, the approach that I have isolates the UI code from the backend code via a socket.  So any wasted effort in picking the wrong tool should be minimized.

I am starting to realize that I have done way too much off-the-cuff design in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the most useful comment on my blog so far.  I guess I was thinking that if I use Java, then I would not use GTK.  C++/gtkmm is probably the safest bet since it can definitely provide everything I need and, as you said in some other post, it is easier to find resources to work on C++ rather than some halfway commented pet project like PHP-GTK.  Although I still think PHP-GTK could be cool.</p>
<p>Probably the right thing to do is to generate a little more formal specification for what we are trying to do and then discuss it more.  I can&#8217;t seem to settle on a technology for this, so that is not a good thing.  However, the approach that I have isolates the UI code from the backend code via a socket.  So any wasted effort in picking the wrong tool should be minimized.</p>
<p>I am starting to realize that I have done way too much off-the-cuff design in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PHP/GTK by Nate Kohari</title>
		<link>http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/?p=4#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Kohari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>If PHP-GTK is fast enough, I'd think that Java would be fast enough too. Applets are terrible and not really indicative of normal performance. You can always optimize out critical sections of the code to native languages, too. Still, Swing is probably not fast enough for what you want. There are probably bindings for native UI libraries like GTK, though.

Most useless comment ever, right? :) Nice blog, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If PHP-GTK is fast enough, I&#8217;d think that Java would be fast enough too. Applets are terrible and not really indicative of normal performance. You can always optimize out critical sections of the code to native languages, too. Still, Swing is probably not fast enough for what you want. There are probably bindings for native UI libraries like GTK, though.</p>
<p>Most useless comment ever, right? <img src='http://www.parisettelane.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Nice blog, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
